The biggest dilemma or issue with my paper is that I do not have enough evidence in my paper. Both of my peer editing partners agreed that my thoughts were very intelligent and well thought of, however, the evidence to support them was lacking. The overall idea of my paper is kind of off the beaten path since I take King’s stance and look at how the school system can change. Rereading the paper though and looking at claims I make helped the process. I was able to look at some of my thoughts and see if King or Henig talked about them in their pieces. I then just used their words instead of mine to talk about a topic.